Loss and My Friend John

I saw my good friend John yesterday.

John is a man who delights in his family. He revels in their company. His wife and daughter are always – and I do mean always – in the forefront of his mind. He feels very close to his sister, and he relished his relationships with his parents until they recently passed away.

Every weekend, every vacation, every spare moment he has available he wants to spend in the company of his family. He chooses them first. Every single time. And his devotion isn’t forced. It comes from a heart filled with love and gratitude for having people to care about.

John has hobbies – he enjoys sports, both playing and watching – but even those interests he shares as much as possible with his loved ones. I can think of no one who gets more fulfillment, more satisfaction from spending time with his family. His unadulterated joy in their presence just radiates from him in big, happy waves.

Which is why the death of his son earlier this year is simply the cruelest thing I’ve ever seen.

John’s son was 19, in his freshman year of college, and he was killed by a quick and sadly painful illness.

His death is devastating to everyone who knew him. But depriving his father of his presence, the father who pulled limitless joy from his son, feels so despicably merciless and mean. And John is shattered. His infectious energy is now subdued. He looks so very sad.

I have hope for John though.

Perhaps it is merely wishful thinking, but I can’t think so. Relegating my good friend to this level of suffering indefinitely is inconceivable for me. How could anyone withstand it? I don’t know how I could cope if one of my daughters died now, and I don’t know how John has been able to function at all these past few months. I fervently wish I could heal him somehow, make him whole again, but he will never be whole again while he walks this earth, and I can’t offer anything that will help him through this trial.

Still, John has two advantages that not everyone in his situation can claim.

First, as he has given his complete devotion to his family, they have returned it to him in full. His wife and his daughter and his sister and the rest of his family loves John like he loves them. The enormous hole left when his son died won’t ever be filled, but the relationships he shares with his other loved ones will continue to grow and deepen as the days and weeks and months and years pass by. They won’t erase his loss, but their love will fill him nonetheless.

Second, he is a faithful man. He believes – strongly – that God exists, that He is benevolent, and that He cares for his flock. I don’t claim to understand faith (I don’t have that tool in my toolbox) but I can see that John, despite his overwhelming grief, believes that the death of his son serves a purpose, inscrutable as it may be. John has found occasional peace and some solace in his prayers and meditations, and as skeptical as I usually am about spiritual things, I believe him in this: his son may be physically absent from his life, but John experiences him in any number of ways that prove to me that his son is very much present. I am far beyond my depth in all things spiritual, but given my own admittedly limited experiences I believe that there are dimensions we don’t understand that nevertheless touch us. And again, maybe I’m naive or simply willing something to be that isn’t, but that’s not how this feels to me.

I grieve with my friend John, even as I can’t fathom the depths of his loss. I also acclaim his humanity, his faith, his stalwartness to move forward in the face of such complete devastation. And I pray – in my own way – that he finds comfort and meaning and relief in his family, including his late son, so he can heal from this wrecking blow. And that no other parent ever has to face something so calamitous.

Faith

I’m a man of faith.

But only in that I believe that we must all believe in something. If there is an objective truth – and there may not be – I don’t know that any of us can see it. But either way, we need to anchor ourselves to a set of beliefs to guide our actions.

Do I believe in God?

Yes, but I don’t give it much energy. My God is generally benevolent, but my God doesn’t intervene in my life. I believe in my free will, I believe I choose my actions, and no amount of pleading for divine intervention will alter my life’s course. I do see serendipity, and I will acknowledge my angels when something goes surprisingly well, but I believe I’m responsible for what happens to me.

My set of beliefs align with most religious tenets. I think that’s because people through the years, including those religious leaders, have recognized that generosity, kindness, humility, forgiveness, community are the healthiest and most constructive paths to happiness and harmony. I identify with Christianity, but I think that’s more of a cultural decision than an acknowledgement of Christianity’s superiority to other faiths. If I’d been raised in China, I would probably identify with Buddhism or if I’d grown up in Thailand I’d be Muslim. While I won’t say religions are the same, they do seem to generally prescribe the same types of behaviors for their followers.

My beliefs are my truth. I fully believe them to be the best way for people to behave, and I will follow them or hold myself accountable when I fail to do so.

My beliefs are my truth. Mine. Not necessarily yours. They are my guide to my personal behavior, and though I believe them to be the best way for you to behave too, I don’t believe I can impose them on you. Because there’s nothing objective that says my beliefs are superior to yours. I could be doing you a tremendous disservice by insisting you adopt my beliefs, and I might be doing myself an equal disservice by not giving more consideration to your beliefs.

Faith must guide our personal choices, but when we come together in community with others, we need a more objective approach to govern our interactions. The genius of the founders of the American democracy is that they saw that no person had the answer to existential questions, no person’s faith was superior to any other’s faith, and so they wrote a Constitution to guide our communal interactions that expressly excluded faith – I can practice my beliefs, you can practice yours, but we cannot impose them on each other. Genius, that.

And very much in keeping with my beliefs. Faith is personal. But secular agreements like the Constitution are what governs us communally. And any leader who would impose faith on others is taking us away from this standard that has worked since our founding.